During an interview with the CBS channel as well as a hearing before a committee of the United States Senate, Frances Haugen attacked the web giant Facebook. In her testimony, she accuses in particular the group of Mark Zuckerberg of privileging the profits to the detriment of the safety of the users. A little late, the leader came to respond to the accusations of the whistleblower by denying everything altogether.
Mark Zuckerberg defends himself against Facebook accusations
Frances Haugen, a former Facebook employee, recently came to accuse the social network of prioritizing its profits over the fight against disinformation, but also of contributing to the spread of fake news and the polarization of society.
YouTube, in turn, is interested in podcasts
Faced with this situation, Mark Zuckerberg came to respond to the accusations of the whistleblower via a long publication on his Facebook page. The leader of the Facebook group underlines to begin with: ” At the heart of these accusations is the idea that we prioritize profits over safety and well-being. It’s just not true “. On the contrary, he claims that the company cares ” deeply into issues such as safety, well-being and mental health ».
Mark Zuckerberg then goes on to recall having put in place means to fight against disinformation, but also for research in order to detect the effects of its applications on the mental health of users. Affirming that the group continues to conduct research around the societal impact of Facebook, he retorts by declaring: “ If we wanted to ignore research, why would we create a cutting edge curriculum to understand these important issues? If we weren’t concerned with tackling harmful content, why would we hire so many dedicated people? ».
Mark Zuckerberg subsequently castigates: “ The argument that we deliberately put forward content that makes people angry, for profit, is completely illogical. We make money from ads, and advertisers tell us over and over again that they don’t want their ads alongside harmful or vehement content. And, I don’t know of any tech company that sets itself (the goal) of developing products that make people angry or depressed. ».
Mark Zuckerberg’s post subsequently calls on the US Congress to update internet regulations regarding the age at which teens can access the internet, but also how tech companies need to verify that age and strike a balance between respecting that age. children’s privacy and the ability for parents to view their children’s online activity. The Facebook executive writes: “ Just like balancing other social issues, I don’t think private companies should make all the decisions on their own (…) This is why we have been arguing for several years for updated Internet regulations. ».
He ends his publication by highlighting the contributions of the social network to users around the world: “ When I reflect on our work, I think of the real impact we have on the world, those people who can now stay in touch with their loved ones, create opportunities to support each other and find community. This is the reason why billions of people love our products ».